Skip to content

fix(client): Fix logic on config locks + change funcs name for more obvious #113

Open
pimielowski wants to merge 7 commits intoPaloAltoNetworks:mainfrom
pimielowski:fix_showing_config_or_commit_locks
Open

fix(client): Fix logic on config locks + change funcs name for more obvious #113
pimielowski wants to merge 7 commits intoPaloAltoNetworks:mainfrom
pimielowski:fix_showing_config_or_commit_locks

Conversation

@pimielowski
Copy link

@pimielowski pimielowski commented Nov 13, 2023

Description

Fix logic choosing correct schema for PANOS versions

Motivation and Context

Name of the function was little confuse.
There was a issue with choosing correct schema based on the PANOS version

How Has This Been Tested?

go test -v ./... + using local code

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes if appropriate.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@pimielowski pimielowski changed the title (!fix/client)Fix logic on config locks + change funcs name for more obvious (fix/client)Fix logic on config locks + change funcs name for more obvious Nov 13, 2023
@pimielowski pimielowski changed the title (fix/client)Fix logic on config locks + change funcs name for more obvious (fix/client): Fix logic on config locks + change funcs name for more obvious Nov 13, 2023
@pimielowski pimielowski changed the title (fix/client): Fix logic on config locks + change funcs name for more obvious fix(client): Fix logic on config locks + change funcs name for more obvious Nov 14, 2023
Copy link

@sebastianczech sebastianczech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this PR duplication of #111 ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants